Noah denkt™ - The Power of Balanced Reasoning
About Noah denkt™       │Über Noah denkt™       │SUCCESS STORIES          │  Legal Notice       │ Disclaimer / Impressum    
Heavy handed police tactics against regular people
A two-for-one comment on the Catalan referendum and the German migration problem, first drafted Oct. 1,
published on Oct. 2, 2017

Yesterday, on the night of the Catalan independence referendum, Noah denkt™ felt a strong urge to add its
voice to the ample commentary about Spain’s inapt response to that regional vote. A day later on Oct. 2,
however, this German-based project faces itself with the question of how can it reasonably mingle into domestic
issues in other countries when it hasn’t addressed the disastrous rise of the far-right (
AfD) in its home territory
(see the German national elections of Sept. 24)  

Now, obviously, we could hide behind our EU-citizenship here and argue that Spanish domestic matters are EU-
matters too. But that would still dodge the AfD-issue which clearly warrants a forthright response as well.


The reason why we haven’t given our two-sense on this yet has to do with the fact that we still haven’t found a
viable solution to the massive refugee crisis that Germany and Europe are being confronted with. There is no
doubt in our mind that
the rise of the AfD in Germany is a consequence of the large and disorderly intake of
asylum seekers in the summer of 2015. Obviously, this intake has put a strain on social coherence in Germany.
Not only is it difficult to see how such a serious number of people originating not just from other countries but
from other continents can be successfully integrated into German society; but it’s equally unclear whether the
asylum seeking process was the right conduit in the first place to address the Facebook migration reality.
Hence, we are left in this matter with the underlying question of what the concept of humanity and
humanitarianism actually requests of post-modern civilized societies. The Pope obviously argues that religious
and humanitarian convictions dictate that all emergency migrants should be welcomed with open arms in
Europe irrespective of the integration challenges that such an open access policy entails. Legal scholars (and
AfD supporters) on the hand maintain that the asylum law refers to political persecution by state agencies only
and that not any ole’ emergency can constitute a legal basis for granting asylum. In this conundrum Michel de
Montaigne (1533 to 1592) may remind us that the adepts of Greek stoicism regarded the inclination for
compassion and pity as reprehensible; instead they were willing to help the afflicted when being made aware of
them but always insisted on not being emotionally affected by the victim’s plight.
(Michel de Montaigne: The Essays,
Chapter one, see:

Noah denkt™ is inclined to take its cues from Stoicism in this matter. We share the belief that meaningful help
can only be granted if it’s done without a bleeding heart since the latter would only abuse of the victim’s pain in
order to thereby remedy the rescuer’s personal trauma experiences in the past.

What all that means in practice though for dealing with people who attempt to cross the Mediterranean on
ramshackle boats without having suffered systematic persecution by state authorities in their home country is a
different matter. Should they be rescued and taken back right away to the African shores? Does due process
really require an honest personalized evaluation of each individual’s request for political asylum complete with a
right to appeal to the courts if the first step evaluation does not produce the migrant’s preferred result? Or is it
thirdly fair to hope that a new immigration law would slow the flow of destitute people to Europe and thereby
avoid humanitarian disasters on the Mediterranean Sea?

Of course, governments have already trimmed down the due process requirements for repatriation of rejected
asylum seekers. And new immigration law concepts are already being discussed in most European countries
including Germany. Nevertheless, the underlying humanitarian question which the spectacle of desperate
migrants raises continues to be philosophically and ethically unanswered. In this moral  quagmire,
Noah denkt™ has so far rejected to take a position arguing that if the Pope cannot get it right how can this
outfit possibly aspire to achieve just that. But we also have to recognize that our failure to take sides in this
debate is jeopardizing the continuation of this project. This is why we have now decided to join the ranks of
those who call for the introduction of a new immigration law, a more rigorous repatriation of rejected asylum
seekers and a trimming down of the due process requirements for the evaluation of asylum seeking petitions.
We don’t like that but the rise of the far-right in Germany (of all countries!) requires some policy adjustments. If
they will ultimately resolve the bigger issues is another matter though. But let’s take this step by step and leave
the remainder of this article to the Catalan issue instead. After all, there is a humanitarian element in this
debate as well.


It seems to us that if you didn’t really understand up until now why Catalans are so adamant about gaining
more respect/autonomy and/or independence from the Spanish state, the images of Spain’s Guardia Civil using
rubber bullets against otherwise regular Catalan voters may have provided some answers here. The spectacle
which the Spanish Federal Police offered to an international audience on Oct. 1, 2017 was a disgrace not just
for Spain but for the entire European Union. It may well have been that the Catalan government was hoping to
produce this kind of images when insisting on following through with its uneasy referendum in the first place.
The fact however that the Rajoy government has fallen into this trap speaks to the latter’s lack of sensitivity,
adroitness and flexibility in this matter. And it is quite likely that it is the very same heavy-handedness which we
have seen yesterday from Madrid which has over the centuries and in recent past reignited Catalonia’s desire
for independence in the first place. It is, therefore, a huge disappointment for everybody who loves Catalonia
and Spain alike to see that Madrid once again made the same mistake and insisted on orthodox legalism when
subtlety and nimbleness would have been required.

From a Northern European perspective it is hard to see now how
Mr. Rajoy whose pro-austerity policies we
have otherwise staunchly defended over the years can stay in power without calling for snap general elections.
Clearly, the sad images of riot police tearing Catalan women by their hair cannot be processed in a business as
usual manner. Serious soul searching is now called for and it seems to us that the European Union has a role
to play here.

When decrying robust police tactics in this case, Noah denkt™ is well aware that our project was way more
generous with rough police tactics when commenting on
the use of tear gas by German police against
protesters of the Stuttgart-21 construction project. So some readers may be tempted to argue that our stances
are contradictory here. But they aren’t. The Stuttgart-21 dispute was about the construction of an ambitious
new train station. There wasn’t a historically charged background to this. No cultural minority felt marginalized
here. And no rights of national recognition were being trampled upon. So the intent to defend the law was in
deed quite unambiguous then. This unambiguity however is not as manifest in the case of Catalonia. The Rajoy
government is not just defending the law here, it is also defending the reach of its own power. The legality
argument is therefore not only about preserving the spirit of law but also a convenient vehicle for Madrid to
safeguard its own interest. That is why less fervor in the application of the legality argument would be very
much warranted.

Likewise the Catalans should understand that their political class is still not experienced and mature enough to
lead Catalonia into a prosperous independence. Whenever Noah denkt™ has had the opportunity to listen to
Catalan leaders speaking to an international audience in their own native language the eventual voice over by
a challenged interpreter made the entire presentation seem like a third-world experience. And it is the
provinciality of Catalan leaders which is ultimately to blame for that. A mutually satisfying middle ground
the lines of the 2006 reform of the Statut should therefore be found by both parties to smooth the tensions
between Madrid and Barcelona. And please, just do it for the benefit of all of us.  
© Landei Selbstverlag, owned by Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards, Gerolstein, Germany. All rights reserved.

Reminder: Noah denkt™ is a project of Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards and his Landei Selbstverlag (WL & his LSV). Consequently, all
rights to the texts that have been published under the Noah denkt
brand name are reserved by WL & his LSV.

The commentary and the reasoning that was provided on this page is for informational and/or educational purposes only and it is
not intended to provide tax, legal or investment advice. It should therefore not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an
offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security or any issuer by WL & his LSV or its Noah denkt™ Project. In fact, WL & his LSV
encourage the user to understand that he alone is responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy is
appropriate or suitable for him. And to leave no doubt as to what this means we urge our user to also note our extended

heavy-handed police tactics in the Catalan independence referendum, the
reprehensible use of rubber bullets against regular citizens and peaceful
protesters, humanitarian convictions in the refugee and migration crisis, how to
defend the spirit of the law in a humanitarian crisis