Noah denkt™  -
    Project for Philosophical Evaluations of the Economy
You need Java to see this applet.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
The exit interview
Bullet Points on G.W. Bush’s final presidential interview, first drafted on Jan. 15,
published on Jan. 19, 2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

George W. Bush’s last interview as President with Larry King has left Noah denkt™ with the following conclusions:

  • Mr. Bush is correct when he points out that actually bearing a responsibility is quite different from thinking
    and opining about it.

  • He is also correct when he explains that his role as commander-in-chief is primarily about staying focused
    on the main issues and not getting sidetracked by a daily news agenda that is hysteric by definition.

  • In this respect, it is equally true that it would be wrong for a commander-in-chief to conduct politics on the
    basis of poll ratings.

  • Additionally, he also gets it right when he ascertains that as President he needs to keep his underlings
    motivated so that he cannot afford himself the luxury to sulk about their failings.

  • And finally, Mrs. Bush is correct when she points out that some of the criticism that was levelled at her
    husband was way too personal.

  • As much as Mr. and Mrs. Bush get it right on the aforementioned issues, it is quite disconcerting though
    that even in their final days in office, they cannot (at least publicly) show a disposition to question or revisit
    any of the reasonings that have led them to take this or that policy stance.

  • Given that it is quite unthinkable to believe that a reasonable leader does not have the occasional doubt
    about certain decisions he took, Noah denkt™ feels compelled to state that the intransigent self-
    assuredness displayed by Mr. Bush in the aforementioned interview has nothing to do with the legitimate
    and principled steadfastness of a good commander-in-chief.

  • Much rather do we believe that this as a sign of stubborn denial which in turn suggests that behind all this
    there is quite a haunted soul hidden which saw no other option for itself but to dig itself in to be able to bear
    the overwhelming criticism that has been and is being levelled at it.

  • It is only because of this denial that Mr. Bush has no qualms in proclaiming that, in deed, he did sleep well
    throughout the eight years, even though in an afterthought he later on felt obliged to add that, of course
    there were the occasional worries that plagued him at times just before going to bed.

  • On Iraq: Obviously it would have been fair for the Bush administration to argue that given the 2001 terrorist
    attacks, given the continued threat for such attacks in the future and given Mr. Husseins’ entrenched
    hostility towards the US (including a prior attempt to have G.H.W. Bush assassinated) the precautionary
    removal of Mr. Hussein from power is imperative for the US in order to protect its national security. The
    problem however is that in this clarity the respective argument was never made. Instead the Bush
    government wrongly suggested an existing collaboration between Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaida,
    exaggerated Iraq’s WMD threat, underestimated the internal frictions in the Iraqi society, misjudged that
    country’s ability to establish a democracy in its borders and generally misinterpreted the preparedness of
    the Arab culture for the advent of freedom and democracy.

  • Overall we have to concur with Mr. Bush when he states that some fundamental issues and challenges
    have, albeit unwillingly by him, been brought to the fore though his presidency. These issues include the
    inadequacy of Mr. Bush’s unilateral foreign policy approach, the inability to export democracy through
    controversial preemptive strikes, and the ineptness of a simple-minded, technocratic neo-liberalism to
    manage the economy.

  • In conclusion Noah denkt™ cannot help but state that in its opinion Mr. Bush probably is an affable human
    being, who should however never have tried to win the Presidency in the first place.   
© Landei Selbstverlag, owned by Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards, Gerolstein, Germany. All rights reserved.

Reminder: Noah denkt™ is a project of Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards and his Landei Selbstverlag (WL & his LSV). Consequently, all
rights to the texts that have been published under the Noah denkt
brand name are reserved by WL & his LSV.

The commentary and the reasoning that was provided on this page is for informational and/or educational purposes only and it is not
intended to provide tax, legal or investment advice. It should therefore not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to
buy, or a recommendation for any security or any issuer by WL & his LSV or its Noah denkt™ Project. In fact, WL & his LSV
encourage the user to understand that he alone is responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy is
appropriate or suitable for him. And to leave no doubt as to what this means we urge our user to also note our extended
Legal
Notice.
__________________________________________________________________________________________