Noah denkt™ - The Power of Balanced Reasoning
About Noah denkt™       │Über Noah denkt™       │SUCCESS STORIES          │  Legal Notice       │ Disclaimer / Impressum    
Is the US losing its face?
Dialogue with the Alter Ego on the US’s pivot to protectionism and "America first", first drafted on Jan. 23,
published on Jan. 25, 2017

Question by Alter Ego of Noah denkt™ (AE): In its various comments on the upcoming Trump presidency, Noah
denkt™ has repeatedly expressed
its hope that the closest advisors of the 45th  President of the United States
(POTUS 45) will be able to steer him away from making the most outrageous mistakes and push him to do the
right thing instead. Does Noah denkt™ still nourish this hope?

Answer by Noah denkt™ (Nd): Not as much as we used to. In the course of the inauguration it has somewhat
dawned on us that Messrs. Mattis, Kelly and Flynn probably don’t  understand the corrosive effect that
protectionist trade policies can have on the strength of traditional military alliances.  It now seems to us as if
they are compartimentalizing their new job as being strictly about military matters only. So they will probably be
able to steer POTUS 45 in the right direction as far as NATO, Russia and Syria is concerned but they won’t
stop him from causing an endless number of trade wars with erstwhile friends and foes alike. That is very
troubling and very disappointing in deed.

AE: What is it exactly that gave you that negative intuition with respect to Sec. Mattis and others?

Nd:  Well, we suddenly realized that security and foreign relations experts especially of the conservative brand
are traditionally strong in analyzing geopolitical power politics (Russia etc…) but that they have little if no
interest for the implications of trade agreements and disagreements.  They tend to view this as an issue of
secondary importance. So they fail to understand that the Trump pivot to protectionism is not just a
disagreement on the price of chicken but a serious threat to the stability of our world order and thereby to the
US itself.  Clearly, we should have realized this earlier. But it was so obvious to us that POTUS 45’s  rejection of
a core US policy stand must lead to a huge international upheaval that we were unable to comprehend that the
extent of this pivot is probably hard to grasp from the inside.   

AE: Can you expand on this? What is so hard to understand from the inside in this?

Nd: If you are US patriot as Sec. Mattis certainly is, the plight of laid-off factory workers in Ohio is clearly closer
to you than the consternation that Chinese leaders may feel over the US betraying its own earlier convictions.  
It is simply harder for you to understand the Chinese point of view.

AE: What is that Chinese point of view?

AE: Well, think about how many US Presidents have gone visiting China lecturing it on the virtue of open
societies, free trade and the values of the international community. Think about how long it has taken China to
warm up to the idea of international trade to begin with, let alone to that of becoming a member of the World
Trade Organization.  Now, that it has finally started to do that the US changes its own stance on free trade and
the value of supranational, collective security arrangements. And it, the US that is, does so just because it has
gotten a little more costly and inconvenient to stay true to its earlier missionary beliefs. Must that pivot by the
US not be perceived by the Chinese as an American loss of face? How can the Chinese continue to view the
US as a credible negotiating partner that stays true to her word if the current experience is that the US ditches
its own high held convictions at the first inconvenience? And what does all this mean for the credit worthiness of
the US? Don’t forget that China is one of the US’s biggest lender. Presumably, the Trump administration will
want to expand on that when it goes to the markets in order to generate massive loans for a huge infrastructure
spending that POTUS 45 has announced during his campaign.  How can China trust that it will in deed get its
money back eventually if the US is now betraying its own word in a matter that supposedly was so fundamental
to it?

AE: So do you anticipate that the US will have a hard time to auction off its Treasury bills in the years to come?

Nd: POTUS 45 is certainly doing what he can to alienate some of the more important foreign creditors. He
repeatedly singled out China in his stump speeches. He wasn’t terribly kind to Saudi Arabia and the Emirates.
he didn’t treat Japan with a lot of heartening respect either. Nevertheless, the US will always have the
option of spreading the bulk of its new debt among domestic organizations thereby inflating balance sheets left,
right and center. So the creditor question may not be as important as one might think.

AE: So where does this leave us with respect to the future of the US?

Nd: It seems very likely to us, that China will want to fill the international vacuum that the US is leaving behind
after its retreat to “America first”. And it is equally likely that it, China that is, will manage to do so because the
US has lost quite a bit of credibility as far as its international leadership is concerned. So countries like Mexico
and others will receive the Middle Kingdom with open arms....  
© Landei Selbstverlag, owned by Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards, Gerolstein, Germany. All rights reserved.

Reminder: Noah denkt™ is a project of Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards and his Landei Selbstverlag (WL & his LSV). Consequently, all
rights to the texts that have been published under the Noah denkt
brand name are reserved by WL & his LSV.

The commentary and the reasoning that was provided on this page is for informational and/or educational purposes only and it is not
intended to provide tax, legal or investment advice. It should therefore not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to
buy, or a recommendation for any security or any issuer by WL & his LSV or its Noah denkt™ Project. In fact, WL & his LSV
encourage the user to understand that he alone is responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy is
appropriate or suitable for him. And to leave no doubt as to what this means we urge our user to also note our extended

China's reaction to Trump's protectionism, The US's pivot to "America first" challenges its
standing in the international community, US leadership under the Trump presidency,
implications of Trump's protectionism in international relations