Noah denkt™ - Project
                   ...demonstrating that a Golden Rule inspired business conduct leads
    to a superior judgment in finance and public policy ...
                                                                       ... "Don't do to others what you don't want them to do to you"...
The UN Security Council at its best
Dialogue with the Alter Ego on the Syrian chemical weapons decommission plan, drafted on  Sept. 21,
published on Sept. 23, 2013

Question by Alter Ego of Noah denkt™ (AE):
Since, Noah denkt™ last commented on the plans for a punitive
strike against Syria the international community has agreed on a UN based procedure according to which the
Assad regime will be forced to surrender all its chemical weapons to international control. Is Noah denkt™
surprised by this turn of events?
Answer by Noah denkt™ (Nd): First of all, we have to apologize that we haven’t addressed this earlier.
Unfortunately,  we have been kept away from work due to a private matter. But, now we are back and we are
happy to answer your question: Yes, we are surprised and elated by the fact that international diplomacy has
finally managed to find a way out of the impasse that it was steering itself into in the Syrian WMD issue.

AE: Do we not have to admit in hindsight
that our criticism of Western pro-strike positions was exaggerated.
After all, it cannot be denied that it is due to President Obama’s insistence in this matter that the current WMD
plan for Syria has been made possible?
Nd: No doubt, all parties involved in this deserve praise: President Obama for forcing the issue while staying
open for a final diplomatic solution; President Putin for developing and pursuing the WMD decommissioning
plan in Syria; and all of us for sticking to our realpolitik convictions even if the latter did not always seem to be

AE: And yet, despite all the positive news, the killing in Syria continues!
Nd. That is true. But it would be unfair to blame the international community for this.

AE: The international community has a responsibility for the maintenance of global peace. That is why a lot of
people are criticising the UN for not doing enough to stop the slaughtering in Syria.
Nd: Look, you cannot enforce peace if people do not want to live peacefully with each other.

AE: People do want to live peacefully with each other in Syria. Only the Assad regime isn’t allowing them to do
Nd: Well, the post-dictatorial evidence in Libya and Egypt suggests that living together peacefully once a
dictatorial regime has been removed isn’t as easy as the Syrian opposition would have us believe.

AE: It is quite natural that repressed societies take time to find a new peaceful balance once the previous
power structure has collapsed. That shouldn’t be an excuse however for the international community to stand
by idly while the Syrians are suffering from the onslaught of a brutal dictatorship.
Nd: The international community is not standing by idly. It is providing humanitarian assistance to the Syrian
refugees; it is applying diplomatic pressure on the Assad regime; some countries are providing weapons to the
rebels; most countries are negotiating directly with representatives of the Syrian opposition; the UN Security
Council continues to look for a common solution to the Syrian quagmire, and no one is unaffected by the
situation in that country.

AE: This is simply not enough though.
Nd: Well, the leaders of the international community do no just have a responsibility towards the enforcement of
human rights elsewhere on the planet. They also have a responsibility to not put their own citizens in harm's
way unless overwhelming evidence dictates that they should do so. And
for reasons laid out previously that
overwhelming evidence simply doesn’t exist in the case of Syria.

AE: Go and tell this to the poor people of Syria who are agonizing over the atrocities that have been committed
against them! See for yourself whether your arguments can stand in the face of so much heart-felt pain.
Nd:  We are quite aware of the fact that it may well be too much to ask of the Syrian people to understand our
point of view here. That doesn’t mean, however, that our reasoning is wrong here. Because sometimes, and
only sometimes, you do need to be somewhat removed from the immediate battlefield in order to understand
what is a truly reasonable and wise move in subject environment.
© Landei Selbstverlag, owned by Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards, Gerolstein, Germany. All rights reserved.

Reminder: Noah denkt™ is a project of Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards and his Landei Selbstverlag (WL & his LSV). Consequently, all
rights to the texts that have been published under the Noah denkt
brand name are reserved by WL & his LSV.

The commentary and the reasoning that was provided on this page is for informational and/or educational purposes only and it is not
intended to provide tax, legal or investment advice. It should therefore not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to
buy, or a recommendation for any security or any issuer by WL & his LSV or its Noah denkt™ Project. In fact, WL & his LSV
encourage the user to understand that he alone is responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy is
appropriate or suitable for him. And to leave no doubt as to what this means we urge our user to also note our extended

chemical weapons in Syria, UN based effort to force a hand-over of all chemical weapons in Syria, stripping the
Assad regime of all chemical weapons, Realpolitik in Syria, military intervention in Syria, international diplomacy
works in Syria, the UN Security lives up to its responsibility in Syria, UN based WMD plan for Syria
Economy / FinancePolitics / Int'l RelationsPhilosophy  │  Qualitätskontrolle  │ Blog                Blog