Noah denkt™  -
    Project for Philosophical Evaluations of the Economy
Back to Homepage
You need Java to see this applet.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Which other non-slimy option is there for a humanities’ major to make a buck than to speculate?
Dialogue with the Alter Ego on Franςois Hollande’s anti-speculation stance, first drafted on Jan 24, published on
Jan. 25, 2012
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Dans cette bataille qui s’engage, je vais vous dire qui est mon adversaire, mon véritable adversaire. Il n’a pas de
    nom, pas de visage, pas de parti, il ne présentera jamais sa candidature, il ne sera donc pas élu, et pourtant il
    gouverne. Cet adversaire, c’est le monde de la finance (…) Quant aux fonds spéculatifs, loin d’avoir disparu, ils sont
    encore les vecteurs de la déstabilisation qui nous vise. Ainsi, la finance s’est affranchie de toute règle, de toute
    morale, de tout contrôle."
    Francois Hollande, Socialist Party Candidate for the French Presidential election, Le Bourget, Jan. 22, 2012
       


Question by Alter Ego of Noah denkt™ (AE): Is Noah denkt™ familiar with the Le Bourget rally speech which
French presidential candidate Franςois Hollande gave on Sunday, January 22?
Answer by Noah denkt™ (Nd):  Yes, we’ve heard about it.

AE: And what do you make of it?
Nd: Well, to a large extent
it echoes the erroneous anti-speculation and anti-financial market stance which is more
or less standard rhetoric all over Europe.

AE: Obviously,
you have made it clear many times before that, in your opinion, widespread financial speculation is
a necessary ingredient to a well-functioning free and advanced society/economy. But, how do you explain all that
to someone like Franςois Hollande, whose ideological prejudice against financial markets is so entrenched that it
is hard to see how he could possibly open up to another philosophical argument on this?
Nd: Well, we would simply ask him to tell us what other professional field there is for an unemployed humanity
major who wants to make an independent buck for himself on his home turf without having to resort to his
otherwise rampant a….-kissing soft skills?

AE: Sorry, we do not understand!
Nd: What’s so difficult to understand here? Is it not true that the employment opportunities for humanity majors
are pretty limited? Are we incorrect when we assert that most of these graduates end up in hopelessly
overcrowded areas such as politics, PR, marketing and sales where, by the very nature of the field they are in,
they will have to engage in an enormous amount of hypocritical schmoozing only to survive just a little bit? And do
we really want to force all these bright young people into even greater misery by depriving them of the last area
that still exists
where you can demonstrate the superiority of your judgments without having to kowtow to
anybody? Is that really what we want to do? – Well, if that is so, then we should not call ourselves social and
charitable to begin with.

AE: But come on, aren’t there lots of other activities where humanity majors can prove their metal in the so-called
real economy?
Nd: Like what?

AE: Well, what about writing? What about teaching? And what about
pioneering a new, innovative business
model?
Nd: You can’t be serious about writing and teaching, can you?  Who really wants to read anything anymore? And
who wants to build his career on jockeying from one annual employment contract to another? No, no, the only
halfway valid suggestion you have come up with here is that of starting your own, innovative business. But as far
as that is concerned you simply have to accept that humanity majors rarely dispose of the real world technical
skills that non-abstract business projects tend to require. So, if you are a true philosopher all you have to make a
difference in this world is your analytical capability. And for that, like it or nor, there happens to be no better real
world application than that of financial speculation.

AE: The truth, however, is that financial speculation has a lot to do with financial and mathematical knowledge
which humanity majors usually do not have, do they?
Nd: In our mind, financial speculation is primarily a philosophical subject since it requires a thorough
deconstruction of our historical, social and human context. Because in the end it is all about judging whether a
glass is better described as being half full or half empty. That people very often try to determine the latter
question on the basis of standardized, technical evaluations is in our opinion a grave misunderstanding anyhow.
Yes, we would even be inclined to argue that most of the follies that occasionally erupt in financial markets have
more to do with the absence of such philosophical judgments than with their uncertainty.

AE: Okay, let’s assume that your reasoning is correct here, then it still needs to be recognized though that it can’t
be adequate to make public policy decisions on the basis of what may or may not be a good proposition for a
rather small group such as humanity majors!
Nd: Well, unfortunately, it isn’t just liberal arts students who are faced with rather miserable job prospects once
they leave the realm of academia. The situation for law school graduates isn’t so much better either. And even the
much acclaimed business school majors can’t necessarily look into a future that is all that much brighter than it is
for humanity majors. So, unless we want to reform academic education altogether, we need to do something for
these people who supposedly are our leaders of tomorrow.   

AE: Alright, we appreciate the argument and hope that you can get some attention for that.
Nd: Yeah, let’s hope for the best even though the latter seems a long way off.
© Landei Selbstverlag, owned by Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards, Gerolstein, Germany. All rights reserved.

Reminder: Noah denkt™ is a project of Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards and his Landei Selbstverlag (WL & his LSV). Consequently, all
rights to the texts that have been published under the Noah denkt
brand name are reserved by WL & his LSV.

The commentary and the reasoning that was provided on this page is for informational and/or educational purposes only and it is not
intended to provide tax, legal or investment advice. It should therefore not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to
buy, or a recommendation for any security or any issuer by WL & his LSV or its Noah denkt™ Project. In fact, WL & his LSV
encourage the user to understand that he alone is responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy is
appropriate or suitable for him. And to leave no doubt as to what this means we urge our user to also note our extended
Legal
Notice.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Back to Homepage
Keywords:

Francois Hollande, defending financial speculation, job prospects for humanity majors, financial
speculation and advanced economy, criticism of Francois Hollande, criticizing
Francois Hollande, in
defense of free financial markets,
philosophy of financial speculation
Back to "Philosophy"-Page