Noah denkt™  -
    Project for Philosophical Evaluations of the Economy
You need Java to see this applet.
Bad Boy Germany, yet again!
Dialogue with the Alter Ego about the Cyprus rescue package, first drafted on March 18, published on March 21,

    Y también parece razonable que los paises europeos aportantes de fondos de rescate limiten su aportación
    a 10,000 milliones y no acepten una cifra solicitada, 17,000 que representa el 100%  del PIB chipriota, es
    decir casi el doble de lo puesto en el caso griego, tres veces lo puesto en los casos de Portugal o Irlanda, o
    veinte veces lo aportado en el caso español.
    Ángel Berges, El rescate a Chipre: una visión pragmática, EL País, 20 de Marzo, 2013  

Question by Alter Ego of Noah denkt™ (AE): Germany’s international image has received yet another severe
blow in connection with the Cyprus rescue package that had been imposed by EURO finance ministers and that,
by now, has been rejected by the Cypriot parliament. In particular, it is has been Germany’s insistence to levy an
extra tax on Cypriot savings accounts that has being heavily criticized internationally. The argument has been and
is that levying such a tax will set a negative precedent elsewhere in Southern Europe which in turn will adversely
affect the recovery prospects there. Does Noah denkt™ agree with this analysis?
Answer by Noah denkt™ (Nd): There is no doubt that Germany has been singled out, yet again, by the
international opinion as being the bad boy. And it really doesn’t help in this respect to remind the audience of the
fact that the IMF had equally backed the bail-out conditions that were originally being negotiated by the EU. The
simple fact remains that
by tradition Germany can’t seem to get it right in the eyes of the international opinion. But
be this, as it may be, the Cyprus rescue package warrants a profound reflection. And after thinking this through
quite a bit, we have come to the conclusion that in case you want to keep Cyprus inside the EURO, which we
ourselves do not necessarily agree with you will be hard pressed to find a better solution than the one that has
been decided upon by the EURO authorities.

AE: And why is that?
Nd: Because the original demand of Cyprus to facilitate a 17 billion EURO bail-out would have been equal to
100% of the Cypriot GDP which in turn would have set a bad precedent for hopefully unnecessary future bail-out
negotiations with other countries. After all, it has to be remembered here that the Greek bail-out only reached a
volume of  roundabout 50% of local GDP, the Portuguese and Irish package reached 33% of their respective
GDPs and the Spanish bank rescue plan accounted for only 5% of local GDP (
see quote above). In other words, mere
justice demanded here that the Cypriot bail-out package would have to include a considerable element of local
Cypriot funds. And where else could you find such money in Cyprus than if not with the local saving account

AE: And the remaining 7 billion Euro that the original EURO bail-out plan fell short off were really worth breaking a
fundamental rule of capitalism which is to encourage savings in order to build up a capital base that can generate
pro-growth investments?
Nd: Well, again,
we would have preferred an exit of Cyprus out of the EURO currency union. But all those who like
to criticize Germany’s position in the EURO rescue effort tend to not view a Cypriot EURO exit as desirable. So
what more can we say?

AE: In other words, Noah denkt™ isn’t happy with the savings account levy either?
Nd: We don’t like it but we could live with it.

AE: And you do not buy the argument that such a tax would erode the trust of savings account holders elsewhere
and therefore lead to a loss of capital being available for the recovery in subject countries?
Nd: Well, as far as we know the EU has made it clear that the Cyprus levy is a one-off only. In other words, people
Spain, Portugal and Italy shouldn’t be too concerned about this since it is quite unlikely that the same will
happen to them.

AE: But how credible is this one-off affirmation of the European Union? Is it not more reasonable to assume that
the EU will be just as prepared to break their one-off promise as it has done so in earlier occasion (Maastricht
treaty) when circumstances seemed to dictate that?
Nd: Well, we believe that this proclamation of Cyprus being an exception is pretty credible. After all, it can’t be
denied that the bank situation in Cyprus is quite different from that of Greece and others. Just think about all the
allegations surrounding Cyprus of being
a money-laundering fiscal paradise. Such allegations aren’t being raised
against banks in Spain. So, it seems to us as if we should take it easy here with our criticism of the EU.

AE: Is it not true that you are
overly lenient here with Germany and the so-called EURO-group?
Nd: We don’t think so. Much rather do we believe that there are bigger issues to worry about, than a relatively
limited contagion scare that might or might no emanate from the Cyprus rescue package. Don’t forget that the
issue of Europe’s future welfare state concept hasn’t been adequately discussed yet.

AE: Still, the markets in Italy, and Spain were quite worried about the Cyprus package. So it should behoove you
as well to address these worries adequately.
Nd: Well, in our opinion the markets didn’t jolt quite as much as one might have though they would. So, we feel
that our nonchalance has been vindicated here.

AE: Let’s wait and see. After all, this Cyprus issue is still on the front-burner.
Nd: You are right, let’s continue to watch this.
© Landei Selbstverlag, owned by Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards, Gerolstein, Germany. All rights reserved.

Reminder: Noah denkt™ is a project of Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards and his Landei Selbstverlag (WL & his LSV). Consequently, all
rights to the texts that have been published under the Noah denkt
brand name are reserved by WL & his LSV.

The commentary and the reasoning that was provided on this page is for informational and/or educational purposes only and it is not
intended to provide tax, legal or investment advice. It should therefore not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to
buy, or a recommendation for any security or any issuer by WL & his LSV or its Noah denkt™ Project. In fact, WL & his LSV
encourage the user to understand that he alone is responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy is
appropriate or suitable for him. And to leave no doubt as to what this means we urge our user to also note our extended

Cyprus bail-out package, bail-out of Cyprus, levy on Cypriot savings accounts, opposition
to Cypriot rescue package, confiscation of Cypriot savings, EURO rescue effort,
Germany's international image, Germany's international reputation