Noah denkt™  -
    Project for Philosophical Evaluations of the Economy
You need Java to see this applet.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Does Latvia’s austerity success serve as a test case for EURO-style debt consolidation?
Observation, drafted and published on March 17, 2013
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Latvia’s success with austerity politics is by now well documented and publicized. (see:
CNBC’s interview with
Latvian Prime Minister Valdis Dombrovskis) . And yet the question still needs to be asked whether that country’s
experience with fiscal shrinking and consolidation (around 17% of GDP) can serve as a test-case for other
embattled countries in Southern Europe.
Former Czech President Vaclav Klaus doesn’t think so. In his address to
the Cato Institute on March 11, he pointed out that the specifics of the Latvian case cannot be compared to those
of Greece or Portugal, since Latvia’s national ambition to escape the overwhelming influence of neighboring
Russia is so much different from that of
Greece or others who already benefit from the protection that EURO
membership does or does not grant.

And in fact, Noah denkt™ cannot deny that Mr. Klaus’s argument is valid here. At the same time though, the
Latvian case proves that the success of austerity depends on political determination, national consensus and
common interest rather than on some obscure law of economic nature as some commentators would have us
believe. In other words, the question that Latvia poses to the societies of Greece, Portugal and
Italy is this: Do
you still want to be part of the EURO and accept the ensuing responsibilities or do you not want to be part of this
multilateral project? After all, that is what it really comes down to. And if it so happens that the national consensus
in subject countries is against embracing the sacrifice of a common European currency then, in the name of God,
they should stop complaining about others and leave instead.
© Landei Selbstverlag, owned by Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards, Gerolstein, Germany. All rights reserved.

Reminder: Noah denkt™ is a project of Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards and his Landei Selbstverlag (WL & his LSV). Consequently, all
rights to the texts that have been published under the Noah denkt
brand name are reserved by WL & his LSV.

The commentary and the reasoning that was provided on this page is for informational and/or educational purposes only and it is not
intended to provide tax, legal or investment advice. It should therefore not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to
buy, or a recommendation for any security or any issuer by WL & his LSV or its Noah denkt™ Project. In fact, WL & his LSV
encourage the user to understand that he alone is responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy is
appropriate or suitable for him. And to leave no doubt as to what this means we urge our user to also note our extended
Legal
Notice.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Keywords:


Euro debt crisis, Latvia, Latvia's success with austerity, opposition to austerity, EURO
rescue effort, austerity policies versus pro-growth policies, supply side versus demand
side politics, Comparing Latvia to Greece, difference between Latvian austerity and Greek
austerity