Noah denkt™  -
    Project for Philosophical Evaluations of the Economy
You need Java to see this applet.
Just another form of Protectionism
Dialogue with the Alter Ego on Britain’s EU separatism, first drafted on Jan. 10, published on Jan. 11, 2013

    "The Obama Administration has warned Britain that it risks damaging its relationship with Washington
    if it abandons the European Union. Speaking on a visit to London, Philip Gordon, Assistant Secretary
    of State for Europe and Eurasia, said that the EU had “increasing weight” in the world and made plain
    that it would be wise for the UK to retain its influence in Brussels."
    The Times, Jan 9, 2013

Question by Alter Ego of Noah denkt™ (AE): It has been widely reported now, that British Prime Minister Cameron
is preparing himself to renegotiate a better membership deal for Britain when the EU begins talks on a new treaty
to deepen political and economic co-operation in the Euro-zone. As far as is known at this point in time, his
intention to repatriate some of the powers that early British governments had ceded to Brussels aims at such
things as exiting from the EU’s working-time directive, or at limiting Britain’s welfare obligations to EU migrants in
the UK. Whatever the scope of his intentions may be though, a lot of people, including
French President
Hollande, UK business leaders such as Richard Branson and others are pretty worried about what Mr. Cameron
might be up to. What is Noah denkt™’s position here?
Answer by Noah denkt™ (Nd): To be honest, we are really not too concerned about this. It seems to us as if the
British separatism, just as much as the Catalan one, is just another bit of opportunistic reaction to the economic
crisis which began with the bursting of the sub-prime bubble in 2007 and which continues with
the Euro debt crisis
to this day.

AE: But isn’t it true that both the Catalonia, as well as Britain have long harbored substantial doubts about their
allegiance to Spain or the European Union respectively? And doesn’t it look quite possible that the current
economic crisis may finally provide them with a golden opportunity to satisfy their long nourished aspirations?
Nd: Obviously, we do not know what the outcome of these separatist initiatives will be. We find it hard to believe
though that a fundamental rearrangement of national and international relations in Europe is upon us.   

AE: Why is that?
Nd: Because this is the last thing we need at this point in time. Instead, we should focus our energy on
strengthening the European competitiveness. Because this is what ultimately enhances our prosperity. Anything
else is just a waist of time.

AE: Now, Mr. Cameron would obviously argue that it is easier for Britain to strengthen its competitiveness when it
isn’t hamstrung by socialist and interventionist policy directives from Brussels.
Nd: Britain’s economy will certainly flourish more if interventionist ideas in Europe can be kept at a minimum. That
however can not be achieved by sidelining yourself in the European debate but rather by being an active
participant in that. In other words, our world is so interconnected these days that it doesn’t even make sense to
be protectionist when defending your own free-market stance.

AE: You cannot possibly be accused of being a protectionist when defending free trade policies? That is a
contradiction in itself.
Nd:  But what other idea is behind Britain’s desire to distance itself from the EU than the objective
to protect
Britain’s economic interests. And how does that differ from other government’s attempt to shield off section’s of
their local industry?

AE: Well, Britain’s interest is not to raise import duties or erect trade barriers? It merely tries to withdraw from
certain obligations that actually hamper free trade.
Nd: You could put it that way. But you could also say that it is disrupting the spirit of benevolence and cooperation
that ties to it other neighboring countries which, by the way, share to a large extent Britain’s own free trade
convictions. Do you not believe that such posturing could easily lead to the erection of trade barriers in the

AE: Okay, let’s assume that you have a point here. But isn’t it still necessary to accept that there is quite a bit of
emotional disconnect between people who are raised in a common law tradition and hence feel a sense of
empowerment and
those on the other side of the Channel who grow up in a top-down elitist realty and who
therefore cannot develop this entrepreneurial can-do attitude when dealing with market disruptions?
Nd: Clearly, there is a substantial gap which is not easy to bridge. But there is nothing that reason, reasoning and
enlightenment cannot achieve.
© Landei Selbstverlag, owned by Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards, Gerolstein, Germany. All rights reserved.

Reminder: Noah denkt™ is a project of Wilhelm ("Wil") Leonards and his Landei Selbstverlag (WL & his LSV). Consequently, all
rights to the texts that have been published under the Noah denkt
brand name are reserved by WL & his LSV.

The commentary and the reasoning that was provided on this page is for informational and/or educational purposes only and it is not
intended to provide tax, legal or investment advice. It should therefore not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to
buy, or a recommendation for any security or any issuer by WL & his LSV or its Noah denkt™ Project. In fact, WL & his LSV
encourage the user to understand that he alone is responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy is
appropriate or suitable for him. And to leave no doubt as to what this means we urge our user to also note our extended

Britain's membership in the European Union, renegotiate Britain's membership in the EU,
Britain's withdrawal from the EU, Britain's separatism, defending British interests, Britain's
independence, Britain and the European Union, Britain's relation to the European Union